Surprisingly social: Private property and environmental management

17Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While scholars express a range of concerns about the use of private property to manage natural resources, an enduring counter-tradition within our idea of private property provides a principled basis for ameliorating or avoiding these concerns. This countertradition, the social obligation norm of property, recognises the intrinsically social function of private property and that private property can impose obligations in addition to conferring entitlements. The New Zealand quota management system for fish and New Zealand Emission Trading Scheme provide illustrations of the presence of this counter-tradition within our law. The counter-tradition also provides a way in which the concerns regarding private property in this space can be addressed, while maintaining the behaviour changing benefits private property offers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

France-Hudson, B. (2017). Surprisingly social: Private property and environmental management. Journal of Environmental Law, 29(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free