Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: Relationship between clinicopathological data and p53, cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 immunoexpressions

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context - Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma has an aggressive behavior, and TNM (UICC) staging is not always accurate enough to categorize patient's outcome. Objectives - To evaluated p53, cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 immunoexpressions in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma patients, without Barrett's esophagus, and to compared to clinicopathological characteristics and survival rate. Methods - Tissue sections from 75 esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas resected from 1991 to 2003 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for p53, cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 using streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method. The mean follow-up time was 60 months SD = 61.5 (varying from 4 to 273 months). Results - Fifty (66.7%) of the tumors were intestinal type and 25 (33.3%) were diffuse. Vascular, lymph node and perineural infiltration were verified in 16%, 80% and 68% of the patients, respectively. The patients were distributed according to the TNM staging in IA in 4 (5.3%), IB in 10 (13.3%), II in 15 (20%), IIA in 15 (20%), IIIB in 15 (20%) and IV in 16 (21.3%). Immunohistochemical analysis was positive for p53, cyclin D1 and bcl-2 in 68%, 18.7% and 100%, respectively. There was no association between immunoexpression and vascular and/or perineural invasions, clinicopathological characteristics and patients' survival rate. Conclusion - In this selected population, there was no association between the immunomarkers, p53, cyclin D1 and bcl-2 and clinicopathological data and/or overall survival.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lehrbach, D. M., Cecconello, I., Ribeiro, U., Capelozzi, V. L., Ab’Saber, A. M., & Alves, V. A. F. (2009). Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: Relationship between clinicopathological data and p53, cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 immunoexpressions. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 46(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032009000400013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free