Comparative Experimental Assessment of Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Performance of Photovoltaic Thermal Systems Using Different Working Fluids

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) systems offer a promising solution for simultaneous electricity and heat generation from solar energy. This study presents an experimental assessment of the thermo-economic and environmental performance of a PV/T hybrid system employing two different working fluids: pure water and an ethylene glycol–water (EG/H2O) mixture. The experiments were carried out under typical summer conditions in Algeria, with all systems constructed to identical specifications and evaluated side by side. The performance of the water-based PV/T (W-PV/T) and ethylene glycol-based PV/T (EG-PV/T) systems was benchmarked against a conventional standalone photovoltaic (SPV) module. Results revealed notable differences in system outputs. The W-PV/T system achieved the highest daily exergy output at 210.08 Wh, outperforming the EG-PV/T (198.85 Wh) and SPV (137.94 Wh) systems. Economically, the W-PV/T configuration exhibited an 8.25-year payback period and delivered the most substantial CO2 emissions reduction at 725.8 kg CO2-eq/m2, translating to an estimated carbon credit value of $32.34/m2. These findings underscore the superior performance of water as a heat transfer fluid compared to EG/H2O mixtures and natural convection, highlighting its potential for enhancing PV/T system efficiency in hot climates. The study offers valuable guidance for optimizing PV/T technology in regions with similar environmental conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lekbir, A., Zaoui, F., Khenfer, R., Rouabah, Z., Mekhilef, S., Boutahar, L., & Samatar, A. M. (2026). Comparative Experimental Assessment of Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Performance of Photovoltaic Thermal Systems Using Different Working Fluids. Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free