CHOOSING BETWEEN PREDICTABLE SHOCK SCHEDULES: LONG‐VERSUS SHORT‐DURATION SIGNALS

Abstract

Two experiments asssessed the relative aversiveness of different duration preshock signals (5 and 20 seconds) and different duration stimuli identifying shock‐free periods. In the first experiment, the responding of 15 of 18 rats was maintained when it produced changes from a predictable‐shock condition with a 5‐second preshock signal to an identical schedule with a 20‐second preshock signal; responding was not maintained when it produced the opposite changes. These results occurred with intershock intervals of both 120 seconds and 240 seconds. The second experiment assessed whether changing to the 20‐second schedule was maintained by properties of the preshock signals identifying the shock periods or by properties of the stimuli identifying the shock‐free periods. Four subjects were given training with the two signaled schedules in an operant chamber and then later given off‐baseline preference tests in a shuttlebox. When given a choice between preshock signals, subjects chose the 5‐second signals over the 20‐second signals. However, when given a choice between stimuli identifying shock‐free periods, subjects chose the stimulus identifying the shorter shock‐free periods (i.e., the one previously correlated with the 20‐second signals). These findings are discussed within the Rescorla and Wagner model of stimulus compounds and within the context of safety as a contrast phenomenon.