Is There a Role for Plasma Exchange in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis?

  • Prendecki M
  • McAdoo S
  • Pusey C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review summarises the evidence for the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis. TPE is an extra-corporeal treatment which efficiently removes IgG and other pathogenic small molecules from the blood. There are several mechanistic reasons why this should be of benefit in AAV including the well-described pathogenicity of ANCA. Recent findings: The recently published PEXIVAS trial is the largest study of TPE in AAV to date. It did not show a benefit for adjunctive TPE on a primary end point of ESRD or death. There was no difference in serious adverse events between those treated with TPE and those treated with immunosuppressive drugs alone. Conclusions: Based on the results of PEXIVAS, most patients with AAV should not be treated with adjunctive TPE. However, there are subgroups of patients with AAV for whom TPE may still be of benefit, including those with double positivity for anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prendecki, M., McAdoo, S. P., & Pusey, C. D. (2020). Is There a Role for Plasma Exchange in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis? Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology, 6(4), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-020-00161-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free