Erratum: Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies? (PLoS Biol (2022) 20:5 (e3001564) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001564)

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Funding statement is incomplete. The correct Funding statement is: The overall project was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to S.H.R. (RI 2488/3 1). Project parts conducted within the laboratory of H.W. in Switzerland were additionally supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation to H.W. (SNF Grant No. 310030–179254). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

von Kortzfleisch, V. T., Ambrée, O., Karp, N. A., Meyer, N., Novak, J., Palme, R., … Richter, S. H. (2022, December 1). Erratum: Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies? (PLoS Biol (2022) 20:5 (e3001564) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001564). PLoS Biology. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001948

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free