Self-evaluation of body image in sport active and sport inactive adolescent girls

2Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Body image is the mental representation one creates about one’s self and is in relation how others see him/her. In the scientific literature, there is a lack of knowledge concerning differences in self-evaluation of body image in sport active and sport inactive adolescent girls. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate satisfaction or dissatisfaction in an individual attitudinal disposition toward the physical self-body image perception with regards to the level of physical activity (sport active and sport inactive) of adolescent girls in two dispositional dimensions: evaluation and orientation for three somatic domains of appearance, fitness and health/illness. This study aimed to investigate how body image was affected with regard to female adolescents’ extracurricular level of physical activity. Methods: In the study 105 sport active adolescent girls (age 16.21 ± 1.54 years) and 49 sport inactive adolescent girls (age 16.99 ± .76 years) participated. We used the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ). For comparison of satisfaction with the perceptions of their own body image in sport active and sport inactive girls MANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used. Results: Our results show that the factor group (sport active or sport inactive adolescent girls) does not significantly affect “body image” represented with the answers to the items of MBSRQ (λ = .898, F(10, 143) = 1.63, p = .103, η2 = .102). Conclusion: This study shows that the level of physical activity does not significantly influence body image in the selected sample of sport active and sport inactive female adolescents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peráčková, J., Chovancová, A., Kukurová, K., & Plevková, L. (2018). Self-evaluation of body image in sport active and sport inactive adolescent girls. Acta Gymnica, 48(3), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2018.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free