ROBOTS, REBUKES, AND RELATIONSHIPS: CONFUCIAN ETHICS AND THE STUDY OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The status and functioning of shame is contested in moral psychology. In much of anglophone philosophy and psychology, it is presumed to be largely destructive, while in Confucian philosophy and many East Asian communities, it is positively associated with moral development. Recent work in human-robot interaction offers a unique opportunity to investigate how shame functions while controlling for confounding variables of interpersonal interaction. One research program suggests a Confucian strategy for using robots to rebuke participants, but results from experiments with educational technologies imply a different and potentially opposing account of shame’s role in personal development. By digging deeper into the details of Confucian theorizing about shame, I identify a unifying explanation for these apparently conflicting results. I conclude by offering suggestions for future empirical research in human-robot interactions to further investigate shame’s role in moral development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elder, A. (2023). ROBOTS, REBUKES, AND RELATIONSHIPS: CONFUCIAN ETHICS AND THE STUDY OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS. Res Philosophica, 100(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2261

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free