Extrusion and Dislocation in Titanium Middle Ear Prostheses: A Literature Review

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Titanium middle ear (ME) prostheses are widely used in surgical practice due to their acoustic properties. However, they present a significant drawback shared by all synthetic materials currently in use for ME reconstruction: they can be rejected by the organism of the host. In this study, we aim to review the current literature on titanium partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORPs) and total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORPs) extrusion and dislocation. Eighty articles were analysed after a full article review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common indication for reconstruction was chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. The average extrusion or dislocation rate was 5.2%, ranging from 0 to 35%. The average improvements in the air–bone gap were 12.1 dB (1.6 dB to 25.1 dB) and 13.8 (−0.5 dB to 22.7 dB) for the PORP and TORP groups, respectively. The data reported on this topic are highly variable, demonstrating that functional outcomes are difficult to predict in clinical practice. We believe that the current limitations could be overcome with technological developments, including bioengineering research focused on promoting prosthesis adaptation to the ME environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Canzi, P., Carlotto, E., Bruschini, L., Minervini, D., Mosconi, M., Caliogna, L., … Benazzo, M. (2023, October 1). Extrusion and Dislocation in Titanium Middle Ear Prostheses: A Literature Review. Brain Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free