Comparative mesoscale residual stress evaluation in a plastically deformed Ti-6Al-4V alloy bar by Ga+ and Xe+ FIB-DIC micro ring-core milling

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A large number of recent studies, both of non-destructive (synchrotron and laboratory microfocus X-ray diffraction) and destructive nature (e.g., FIB-DIC micro ring-core ion milling) report success in probing residual stresses at the 0.5–10 μm micro- to nano- scale to accompany conventional approaches at the macro-scale (the contour method, blind hole drilling) capable to provide data at the 0.5–10 mm resolution. However, the mesoscale range between 50 and 500 μm (0.05-0.5 mm) still presents a challenge both in terms of practical implementation, data processing and interpretation. One way to increase the size of the probe in FIB-DIC analysis is to use Xe ion beam in place of Ga. This allows scaling up the gauge volume (probe) size from 5–20 µm (Ga-ion FIB) to 50–80 µm (Xe-ion FIB) to obtain information about Type I + II residual stress. In this article, we present a comparative study of residual stress evaluation in an alpha–beta Ti-6Al-4V alloy bar after 3-point plastic bending. Electron Backscatter Diffraction microstructure mapping revealed almost texture-free polycrystal with near-equiaxed grains of mean diameter 5–10 μm. Nanoindentation was employed to obtain a correlation between hardness and residual stress. The results obtained allowed the consideration of statistical representativeness and fidelity of FIB-DIC techniques in inhomogeneous anisotropic polycrystals and offer recommendations for future technique development towards convergence with other methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Statnik, E. S., Somov, P. A., Lipovskikh, S. A., Salimon, A. I., & Korsunsky, A. M. (2026). Comparative mesoscale residual stress evaluation in a plastically deformed Ti-6Al-4V alloy bar by Ga+ and Xe+ FIB-DIC micro ring-core milling. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121488

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free