Rethinking 'essential' and 'nonessential': The developmental paediatrician's COVID-19 response

20Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While terms such as 'essential' and 'nonessential' used amidst the COVID-19 pandemic may serve a practical purpose, they also pose a risk of obstructing our view of the harmful indirect health consequences of this crisis. SARS-CoV-2 cases and deaths in children are minimal compared to adults, but the pandemic impacts other 'essential' aspects of children's health including child development and the associated areas of paediatric behaviour, mental health, and maltreatment. Alongside the management of severe SARS-CoV-2 cases in emergency rooms and intensive care units, continuing to care for children with developmental disabilities must also be concurrently championed as 'essential' during this crisis. The potentially devastating lifelong effects of the pandemic and isolation on an already vulnerable population demand that action be taken now. Video conferences and phone calls are 'essential' instruments we can use to continue to provide quality care for our patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fung, A., & Florencia Ricci, M. (2020, August 1). Rethinking “essential” and “nonessential”: The developmental paediatrician’s COVID-19 response. Paediatrics and Child Health (Canada). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxaa077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free