Flattening of the Earth: Further from hydrostaticity than previously estimated

75Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The knowledge of the gravitational potential coefficients J2 and J4 of a hydrostatic Earth model is necessary to deal with non-hydrostatic properties of our planet. They are indeed fundamental parameters when modelling the 3-D density structure or the rotational behaviour of our planet. The most widely used values computed by Nakiboglu need to be updated for two reasons. First, we have noted a mistake in one of his formulae. Secondly, the value of the inertia ratio I/MR2 chosen at the time of prem is not any more the best estimate. Both corrections slightly but significantly reduce the hydrostatic J2 value: the dynamical flattening of the Earth is even further from hydrostaticity than previously thought. The difference between the polar and equatorial radii appears to be 113 ± 1 m (instead of 98 m) larger than the hydrostatic value. Moreover, uncertainties upon the hydrostatic parameters are estimated. © 2010 The Authors Geophysical Journal International © 2010 RAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chambat, F., Ricard, Y., & Valette, B. (2010). Flattening of the Earth: Further from hydrostaticity than previously estimated. Geophysical Journal International, 183(2), 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04771.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free