Abstract
This research note presents a set of strategies to conduct small-N comparisons in policy research including the Swiss case. Even though every country can be considered "special" to some extent, the Swiss political system is often viewed as a particularly difficult case for comparison because of the impact of its idiosyncratic institutional features (most notably direct democracy). In order to deal with this problem, our note sets out two possible strategies - the use of functional equivalents and of counterfactual reasoning - and explains how to implement them empirically through process tracing and the establishment of causal chains. As an illustration, these strategies are used for a comparison of the process of electricity market liberalisation in Switzerland and Belgium. © (2008) Swiss Political Science Review.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Fontana, M. C., Afonso, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2008). Putting the special case in its place: Switzerland and small-N comparison in policy research. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(3), 521–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2008.tb00111.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.