A comparison of methods for assessing dough and gluten strength of durum wheat and their relationship to pasta cooking quality

52Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The best rheological test to differentiate dough and gluten strength and predict cooking quality of different durum wheat cultivars is not recognised yet. Sixteen durum wheat cultivars were grown at three locations in North Dakota using a randomised complete block design to compare different methods for measuring dough/gluten strength and to relate their results to pasta cooking quality. Different rheological tests were used to distinguish the weak, medium strong, strong and very strong gluten cultivars. Alveograph, gluten index and glutograph were the only tests that could differentiate between medium strong and strong gluten samples. Alveograph was the best method to predict gluten strength where few samples are available for assessment. In comparison with alveograph, the gluten index was faster and required less semolina and gave similar results as the alveograph. All tests had significant correlation with cooked spaghetti firmness and negative correlation with cooked weight. © 2012 The Authors. International Journal of Food Science and Technology © 2012 Institute of Food Science and Technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abuhammad, W. A., Elias, E. M., Manthey, F. A., Alamri, M. S., & Mergoum, M. (2012). A comparison of methods for assessing dough and gluten strength of durum wheat and their relationship to pasta cooking quality. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(12), 2561–2573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03135.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free