Evaluation of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria as a Predictor of Mortality in Emergency Patients Transported by Ambulance

26Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Based on the concept of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), a one year retrospective study was carried out to examine SIRS criteria as a simple and rapid predictor of outcome for emergency patients. Among a total of 2,180 patients transported to the emergency room by ambulance, 318 (14.8%) had primary SIRS and 389 (17.8%) met SIRS criteria at some point during the entire treatment period. The admission rate for primary SIRS increased sequentially as more SIRS criteria were met, rising from 15.4% in non-SIRS to 100% when all four criteria were met. The mortality of primary SIRS also increased sequentially as more SIRS criteria were met, rising from 1.4% in non-SIRS to 35.3% when all four criteria were met. Furthermore, heart rate, C-reactive protein and platelet count were considered to be potentially useful new criteria for a group of SIRS patients with a high risk of mortality (high-risk SIRS), based on a comparison of variables between SIRS patients who died and SIRS patients who survived. The mortality associated with primary SIRS increased sequentially as more high-risk SIRS criteria were met, rising from 7.6% when none were met to 50.0% when two criteria were met. Considering the high specificity of primary SIRS for admission (89.5%) and mortality (86.8%), SIRS criteria have clinical and prognostic importance in the management of emergency patients. Given the high mortality (29.9%), the new high-risk SIRS criteria may also be useful as entry criteria for clinical trials of innovative therapies for patients with SIRS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asayama, K., & Aikawa, N. (1998). Evaluation of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria as a Predictor of Mortality in Emergency Patients Transported by Ambulance. Keio Journal of Medicine, 47(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.47.19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free