Correction to: ``Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial'' [Statist. Sci. 14 (1999), no. 4, 382--417; MR 2001a:62033]

  • Hoeting J
  • Madigan D
  • Raftery A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Standard statistical practice ignores model uncertainty. Data analysts typically select a model from some class of models and then proceed as if the selected model had generated the data. This approach ignores the uncertainty in model selection, leading to over-confident inferences and decisions that are more risky than one thinks they are. Bayesian model averaging (BMA)provides a coherent mechanism for accounting for this model uncertainty. Several methods for implementing BMA have recently emerged. We discuss these methods and present a number of examples.In these examples, BMA provides improved out-of-sample predictive performance. We also provide a catalogue of currently available BMA software.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (2002). Correction to: ``Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial’’ [Statist. Sci. 14 (1999), no. 4, 382--417; MR 2001a:62033]. Statistical Science, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009212814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free