Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) in the Polish population

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) was developed in Italian to assess the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) impairment in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) in daily practice. Aim: To cross-culturally validate the Polish version. Material and methods: The Polish version was administered to patients suffering from asthma and rhinitis in a prospective observational study. Polish RAPP, along with SF-12, ACT, and a Symptomatologic VAS was filled in twice, with a 4-week interval between visits. At visit 2, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) was completed to assess any change in health status. Internal consistency, validity, reliability, discriminant ability and responsiveness to change as well as Minimal Important Difference were determined. Results: The factor and confirmatory analysis revealed a unidimensional structure of RAPP. Internal consistency was satisfactory with Cronbach’s α (visit 1 = 0.85, visit 2 = 0.89). High reliability (ICC = 0.89 and a CCC = 0.94) was found. Validity analyses showed good correlations of the Polish RAPP with Physical and Mental Component Scores of SF-12. In addition, RAPP adequately discriminated patients on the basis of the asthma control level and rhinitis severity (p < 0.03 for all the analyses), and demonstrated to be sensitive to change. MID value was 1 point. Conclusions: The study confirmed the reliability and validity of the Polish version of RAPP demonstrating that it is a useful tool in the assessment of HRQoL in patients with asthma and comorbid allergic rhinitis, in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kupczyk, M., Baiardini, I., Molinengo, G., Loera, B., Szydłowska, D., Kuna, P., … Braido, F. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) in the Polish population. Postepy Dermatologii i Alergologii, 37(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2020.93387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free