Light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization: Non-radioactive labeling and detection, double hybridization, and combined hybridization- immunocytochemistry

32Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We performed light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization, according to the same protocol and without pretreatment of sections, on Lowicryl- and LR Gold-embedded cells. Digoxigenin (DIG)- or biotin-labeled riboprobes were visualized by direct or indirect immunodetection using commercially available gold-antibody conjugates with 0.8-10-nm gold grains. At the ultrastructural level, the main findings were that DIG-labeled probes gave a slightly higher labeling intensity (grains per signal) than biotin. The direct detection method produced a more compact signal, which led to better resolution at medium and high magnifications. Labeling intensities of all gold grain sizes were essentially equal. Grain sizes of 5 nm and larger were highly preferable because available enhancement methods are unsatisfactory for ultrasmall grains. The optimized immunodetection protocols are suitable for double hybridization with two different probes and for combined hybridization and immunocytochemistry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egger, D., Troxler, M., & Bienz, K. (1994). Light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization: Non-radioactive labeling and detection, double hybridization, and combined hybridization- immunocytochemistry. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 42(6), 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/42.6.8189042

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free