Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR)

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The current landscape of treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is rapidly evolving with the advent of the bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR). BEAR is a novel approach to restore the ACL in lieu of conventional reconstruction. BEAR has recently been approved for post-market use by all orthopaedic surgeons for midsubstance or proximal ACL tears. This article provides a review of the indications and outcomes of BEAR, graduating from the Trial 1 stage to the post-market stage, current operative techniques, and the postoperative rehabilitation protocol for BEAR. Recent Findings: Current research demonstrates similar postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and functional outcomes following BEAR compared to ACL reconstruction in clinical trials. Combining all three BEAR trials, there was an aggregate re-tear rate of 15%. Our post-market published BEAR data shows non-inferior short-term postoperative PROMs and functional outcomes as well as zero re-tears. Summary: The early- and mid-term results of BEAR show that it is a potential alternative to ACLR for specific patient groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, A. K., Neijna, A. G., Retzky, J. S., Gomoll, A. H., & Strickland, S. M. (2025, April 1). Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR). Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-025-09950-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free