A systematic study has been made of the application of the real gas pseudo-pressure m(p) to short-time gas well testing. The m(p) function can be use4 in real gas flow problems to account for the variation of viscosity and z-factor with pressure. A mathematical model was solved numerically to generate solutions of various real gas flow problems. The effects of turbulence, formation damage and wellbore storage were included in the model. The analysis of simulated well tests showed that the interpretation methods normally used for liquid flow are generally accurate when the m(p) is used. For practical rates without turbulence, the solutions are not rate-sensitive , and the flow capacity kh and skin effect can be determined accurately from either a buildup or a drawdown test. However, the kh calculated from a drawdown test can be significantly low when turbulence is present. A case was simulated in which this error was 36 percent. Turbulence does not affect the determination of kh from buildup tests. The proper determination of kh from p and p2 buildup and drawdown plots is developed by analyzing their relationship to the m(p) method. A simple equation is given that can be used for long-range gas well performance forecasting. This expression is compared with a method pre-sended hy Russell et al. 19
CITATION STYLE
Wattenbarger, R. A., & Ramey, H. J. (1968). Gas Well Testing With Turbulence, Damage and Wellbore Storage. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 20(08), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.2118/1835-pa
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.