Minimizing contrast media dose in CT pulmonary angiography with high-pitch technique

25Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To perform CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using a minimal amount of iodinated contrast media. Methods: 47 patients (25 females) with mean age 69 years (range 41-82 years) referred for contrast-enhanced chest CT were prospectively included in this Phase IV clinical drug trial. All participants underwent a study specific CTPA in addition to the chest CT. The participants received 80 mg I/kg body weight Iohexol contrast media using a preparatory saline bolus, a dual flow contrast/saline bolus and a saline flush, and a scanner protocol with 80 kVp dual source high-pitch mode. Three readers independently assessed the image quality on the 3-point scale non-diagnostic, adequate or good-excellent image quality. Additionally, the pulmonary arterial contrast opacification was measured. Results: On average, the patients received 16.8 ml Iohexol 350 mg I/mL (range 12-20 ml). Mean patient weight was 71 kg (range 50-85 kg). Identically for all readers, pulmonary embolism (PE) was detected in 1/47 participants. The median number of examinations visually scored concerning pulmonary embolism as good-excellent was 47/47 (range 44-47); adequate 0/47 (0-3) and non-diagnostic 0/47 (range 0-0). The proportion adequate or better examinations was for all readers 47/47, 100% [95% confidence interval 92-100%]. The mean attenuation } standard deviation in the pulmonary trunk was 325 } 72 Hounsfield unit (range 165-531 Hounsfield unit). Conclusions: Diagnostic CTPA with 17 ml contrast media is possible in non-obese patients using low kVp, high pitch and carefully designed contrast media administration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alobeidi, H., Alshamari, M., Widell, J., Eriksson, T., & Lidén, M. (2020). Minimizing contrast media dose in CT pulmonary angiography with high-pitch technique. British Journal of Radiology, 93(1111). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190995

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free