Understanding lipidomics associations and the lipoprotein-related caveats in population epidemiology

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mass spectrometry lipidomics is becoming customary to analyze serum/plasma samples in epidemiology. The measurables are molecular constituents of lipoprotein particles, but very little is known about the consequences of adjusting lipidomics data with lipoprotein measures. We studied 2 population cohorts with 5657 and 2036 participants. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry lipidomics was applied to analyze 24 molecular lipid classes and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to quantify 7 lipoprotein lipids plus apolipoprotein A-I and B. The associations of these measures were analyzed via partial Spearman’s correlations. The effects of 9 different lipoprotein adjustments on these interrelationships were assessed. Multivariable regression modeling with these adjustments was also performed for the associations between the lipidomics data and body mass index. These novel large-scale lipidomics data and their associations between the lipoprotein measures were coherent in both population cohorts, confirming the compatibility of the analytical approaches. Simulated data were generated to corroborate the mediation effects. The lipoprotein-related lipid transport and metabolism inherently mediate the lipidomics associations, as evident from the striking effects of the lipoprotein adjustments. These effects and their relevance to the interpretations of lipidomics data are presented and discussed in detail for the first time. The combined lipoprotein lipid adjustments appear prone to overadjustment and arbitrary biases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, S., Ohukainen, P., Kettunen, J., Järvelin, M. R., Kähönen, M., Lehtimäki, T., … Ala-Korpela, M. (2025). Understanding lipidomics associations and the lipoprotein-related caveats in population epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 194(10), 2800–2812. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae445

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free