It's only made things worse: A critique of electoral reform in Britain

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since it came to power, New Labour has introduced a range of new electoral system into the British political system, implicitly accepting the argument that Britain's traditional electoral system - first-past-the-post (FPTP) - has been a cause of voter disenchantment with Britain's representative democracy. In this article, it is asserted that Labour's reforms have merely compounded this problem, while demonstrating that all electoral systems have significant flaws. Indeed, it is argued that the flaws of the new systems are more serious than those of FPTP and threaten an even greater disconnection between UK politicians and the people they represent.© The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, R. (2008). It’s only made things worse: A critique of electoral reform in Britain. Political Quarterly, 79(2), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00915.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free