New directions for participatory modelling in health: Redistributing expertise in relation to localised matters of concern

21Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Participatory modelling seeks to foster stakeholder engagement to better attune models to their decision-making and policy contexts. Such approaches are increasingly advocated for use in the field of health. We review the instrumental and epistemological claims made in support of participatory modelling approaches. These accentuate participatory models as offering a better evidence-base for health policy decisions. By drawing attention to recent modelling experiments in a sector outside of health, that of water management, we outline a different way of thinking about participation and modelling. Here, the participatory model is configured in relation to matters of ‘knowledge controversy’, with modelling constituted as an ‘evidence-making intervention’ in relation to the making of science and expertise. Rather than presenting participatory models as an improved technical solution to addressing given policy problems within an evidence-based intervention approach, models are alternatively potentiated as sites for the redistribution of expertise among actor networks as they seek to engage politically in a matter of concern. This leads us to consider possible new directions for participatory modelling in the field of health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adams, S., Rhodes, T., & Lancaster, K. (2022). New directions for participatory modelling in health: Redistributing expertise in relation to localised matters of concern. Global Public Health. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1998575

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free