Computed tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for identifying acute lesions in pediatric traumatic brain injury

37Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice to screen for brain injuries. MRI may provide more clinically relevant information. The purpose of this study was to compare lesion detection between CT and MRI after TBI. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of children (0-21 years) with TBI between 2008 and 2010 at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center with a head CT scan on day of injury and a brain MRI scan within 2 weeks of injury. Agreement between CT and MRI was determined by κ statistic and stratified by injury mechanism. RESULTS: One hundred five children were studied. Of these, 78% had mild TBI. The MRI scan was obtained a median of 1 day (interquartile range, 1-2) after CT. Overall, CT and MRI demonstrated poor agreement (κ=-0.083; P=.18). MRI detected a greater number of intraparenchymal lesions (n=36; 34%) compared with CT (n=16; 15%) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buttram, S. D. W., Garcia-Filion, P., Miller, J., Youssfi, M., Brown, S. D., Dalton, H. J., & Adelson, P. D. (2015). Computed tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for identifying acute lesions in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Hospital Pediatrics, 5(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2014-0094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free