A hockey night in canada: An imagined conversation between theorists

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, various methodological issues surrounding the sociological study of sport are explored. Through an imagined dialogue between two graduate students at a hockey game, this work brings together three divergent approaches to social enquiry: Positivist Grounded Theory, Constructivist Grounded Theory, and Actor-Network Theory. This paper challenges conventional writing on method in two ways: (a) assembling three divergent approaches within a single work, and (b) employing a scripted narrative as a means of exploring methodological issues. Through this innovative approach, many of the overlaps and tensions between these theories/methods are captured. In so doing, numerous methodological questions about the sociological study of sport, as well social science research more generally are raised. © 2010, Curtis Fogel and Nova Southeastern University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fogel, C. (2010). A hockey night in canada: An imagined conversation between theorists. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 658–674. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free