This Is Not a Game: Violent Video Games, Sacred Space, and Ritual

  • Wagner R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the middle of the twentieth century, long before video games were even imagined as a mode of popular entertainment, religious theorist Mircea Eliade argued that the recognition of the "sacred" within the "profane" world is a kind of order-making activity, offering a "hierophany" that reveals "an absolute fixed point, a center" within otherwise chaotic space (21). ...]says Hillis, users of virtual reality "may experience desire or even something akin to a moral imperative to enter into virtuality where space and light ...have become one immaterial 'wherein.'" We are motivated by the desire for a "sense of entry into the image" and encouraged to view the screen and its mechanisms as a "transcendence machine" or "subjectivity enhancer," that "works to collapse distinctions between the conceptions built into virtual environments by their developers and the perceptive faculties of users" ("Modes of Digital Identification" 349).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, R. (2014). This Is Not a Game: Violent Video Games, Sacred Space, and Ritual. Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569x.1439

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free