The jurisprudence of universal subjectivity: COVID-19, vulnerability and housing

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drawing upon Martha Fineman’s vulnerability theory, the paper argues that the legal claims of homeless appellants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrate our universal vulnerability which stems from the essential, life-sustaining activities flowing from the ontological status of the human body. By recognizing that housing availability has constitutional significance because it provides for life-sustaining activities such as sleeping, eating and lying down, I argue that the legal rationale reviewed in the paper underscores the empirical, ontological reality of the body as the basis for a jurisprudence of universal vulnerability. By tracing the constitutional basis of this jurisprudence from Right to Travel to Eighth Amendment grounds during COVID-19, the paper outlines a distinct legal paradigm for understanding vulnerability in its universal, constant and essential form – one of the central premises of vulnerability theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jobe, K. S. (2021). The jurisprudence of universal subjectivity: COVID-19, vulnerability and housing. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 21(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291211032843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free