Abstract
This article contributes to the discussion about proper product safety in the wake of disruptive digital technologies. By picking the example of 3D printing we analyse why incumbent product liability law does not incentivise optimal deterrence of harmful 3D printed products. We identify the new business models associated with 3D printing as the main trigger for the non-applicability of incumbent liability law. The new business models are characterised by making no strong reference to economies of scale. As a result, the informational content of specific producers and their products is scarce and the identification of tortfeasors becomes a challenge for the legal system. While there is yet no easy solution to the problem, we provide at the end of the article an inventory of institutions that may take the lead in finding new proper liability rules and safety regulations.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Heine, K., & Li, S. (2019). What shall we do with the Drunken Sailor? Product Safety in the Aftermath of 3D Printing. In European Journal of Risk Regulation (Vol. 10, pp. 23–40). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.4
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.