Fluid balance error in continuous renal replacement therapy: A technical note

10Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. The reliability and safety of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) machines have improved, yet there still remains the potential for fluid balance errors to occur during treatment. Methods. In vitro testing of two Kimal Hygieia CRRT machines (Plus and Ultima) was performed. Normal saline to simulate the blood circuit and standard bicarbonate-based fluid for replacement were used. All tests were performed in CVVH mode at four ultrafiltration (UF) rates. The testing was based on creation of a voluntary fluid balance error by clamping the line that fills the replacement fluid chamber to stop flow to the (simulated) patient. The time to alarms and fluid balance errors were recorded. The alarms were overridden and the accumulated fluid balance error allowed by the machine was determined. Results. The alarm occurred approximately 1 minute after the replacement fluid line was clamped at all UF rates. There was no limit to the number of times the alarm could be overridden and the accumulated negative fluid balance was proportional to the prescribed UF rate. After the replacement fluid chamber was allowed to re-fill, the machine attempted to correct the fluid deficit and consistently delivered excess fluid to generate a positive fluid balance error. Conclusions. The Hygieia machines appear designed with appropriate alarm and safety features. However, simulated fluid balance errors raise caution for operators. Clinicians and nurses need to understand the clinical implications of alarm overrides. Fluid balance errors caused failure to acknowledge and correct replacement fluid failure alarms may cause harm to patients. © Wichtig Editore, 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagshaw, S. M., Baldwin, I., Fealy, N., & Bellomo, R. (2007). Fluid balance error in continuous renal replacement therapy: A technical note. International Journal of Artificial Organs, 30(5), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/039139880703000511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free