Investigation on fabrication of reduced graphene oxide-sulfur composite cathodes for Li-S battery via hydrothermal and thermal reduction methods

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery is considered one of the possible alternatives for next-gener-ation high energy batteries. However, its practical applications are still facing great challenges be-cause of poor electronic conductivity, large volume change, and polysulfides dissolution inducing “shuttle reaction” for the S cathode. Many strategies have been explored to alleviate the aforemen-tioned concerns. The most common approach is to embed S into carbonaceous matrix for construct-ing C-S composite cathodes. Herein, we fabricate the C-S cathode reduced graphene oxide-S (rGO-S) composites via one step hydrothermal and in-situ thermal reduction methods. The structural fea-tures and electrochemical properties in Li-S cells of the two type rGO-S composites are studied sys-tematically. The rGO-S composites prepared by one step hydrothermal method (rGO-S-HT) show relatively better comprehensive performance as compared with the ones by in-situ thermal reduction method (rGO-S-T). For instance, with a current density of 100 mA g−1, the rGO-S-HT composite cathodes possess an initial capacity of 1290 mAh g−1 and simultaneously exhibit stable cycling ca-pability. In particular, as increasing the current density to 1.0 A g−1, the rGO-S-HT cathode retains a reversible capacity of 582 mAh g−1 even after 200 cycles. The enhanced electrochemical properties can be attributed to small S particles uniformly distributed on rGO sheets enabling to significantly improve the conductivity of S and effectively buffer large volume change during lithiation/delithi-ation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z., Sun, H., Pang, Y., Yu, M., & Zheng, S. (2021). Investigation on fabrication of reduced graphene oxide-sulfur composite cathodes for Li-S battery via hydrothermal and thermal reduction methods. Materials, 14(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free