Accounting for Sustainability: Episteme Change and Ontological Plurality

  • Birkin F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent research reveals accounting for sustainable development to be both problematic and essential. Th is paper considers that the problems arising may be intrinsic to the concepts and structures of Modern accounting and that their resolution lies ultimately in the development of the consequences of a new possibility of knowledge or episteme. Aft er a brief presentation of the nature and historic impacts of episteme change, this paper explores the epistemic origins of Modern accounting. Evidence for a new, other than Modern, episteme is then presented and its consequences for accounting for sustainable accounting are explored. Significant evidence in this regard is the work of Bruno Latour from Actor-Network Th eory to the plurality of ontologies. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Birkin, F. K. (2016). Accounting for Sustainability: Episteme Change and Ontological Plurality. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 32(4), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2016.406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free