Case and commentary: Peer-reviewed article: Should patients who receive postexposure prophylaxis after sexual assault be considered for preexposure prophylaxis for hiv?

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Clinicians who encounter patients after sexual assault must offer competent, compassionate, trauma-informed care that fosters a patient's sense of safety and trust. In this case, a patient presents for HIV postexposure prophylaxis after a second sexual assault by the same perpetrator. This article considers how to balance providing a potentially beneficial intervention and avoiding retraumatization and stigmatization. Clinicians who facilitate patient-centered decision making about preexposure prophylaxis can respond to a patient's immediate needs and support her autonomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blain, M., & Dombrowski, J. C. (2021, May 1). Case and commentary: Peer-reviewed article: Should patients who receive postexposure prophylaxis after sexual assault be considered for preexposure prophylaxis for hiv? AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.388

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free