The reconciliation between history and comparison

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since its definition as a method considered as 'scientific', towards the end of the 19th century, the comparative method in the social sciences has relied on the principle of causality. In shaping this conception of comparative methodology, the example of the natural sciences and the impact of the orthodox philosophy of science have always been crucial. However, in contrast to scientistic assumptions of this kind, this article refers to far-reaching paradigm shifts and theoretical reorientations that are associated with the emergence of interdisciplinary theory programs on 'self-organization', 'autopoiesis' and 'complex causality'. The article is aimed, then, at delineating an alternative approach to comparative analysis, i.e. an approch that promises to take more adequately into account the complex causal relationships that are characteristic of macrosocial configurations, as well as the irrevocably historical nature of the social world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schriewer, J. (2019). The reconciliation between history and comparison. Revista Espanola de Educacion Comparada. Univ Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED). https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.34.2019.25170

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free