Femoral Tunnel Drilling Method: Revision Risk After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

  • Tejwani S
  • Prentice H
  • Wyatt R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:The femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be created by the transtibial (TT) or tibial-independent (TI) methods. An anatomically located femoral tunnel can be more consistently achieved by TI methods, which include the anteromedial portal and lateral (outside-in, retrodrill) techniques. Nonanatomic graft placement in ACLR can result in postoperative instability and meniscal or chondral injury. An anatomically located graft is subjected to higher postoperative physiologic forces than one placed nonanatomically.Purpose:To examine isolated primary ACLR and determine the risk of aseptic revision and reoperation based on femoral tunnel drilling method.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:The ACLR registry of an integrated US health care system was used to identify primary isolated unilateral ACLRs from 2009 to 2014. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate risk for aseptic revision for graft failure and aseptic ...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tejwani, S., Prentice, H. A., Wyatt, R., & Maletis, G. B. (2017). Femoral Tunnel Drilling Method: Revision Risk After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 5(7_suppl6). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117s00302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free