Mixed treatment comparison of prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients receiving therapy for haematological malignancies: A systematic review

31Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Patients receiving therapy for haematological malignancies have a higher risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Antifungal prophylaxis is an effective strategy against IFIs, but relative effectiveness estimates across agents are inconclusive. A mixed treatment comparison (MTC) was conducted to estimate the relative effectiveness of all agents for a number of outcomes of interest. Methods: A systematic review was performed to collect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the risk of IFIs and on mortality after antifungal prophylaxis. The agents analysedwere no prophylaxis/placebo, fluconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, caspofungin, liposomal amphotericin B and posaconazole. Meta-analyses and MTCswere used to synthesize the evidence. The primary outcomewasthe risk of proven or probable IFI. Secondary outcomes were risk of candidiasis/aspergillosis, risk of IFI mortality and risk of all-cause mortality. Results: Antifungal prophylaxis was more effective than no prophylaxis/placebo in reducing IFI risk. The IFI risk after voriconazole or posaconazole was lower than after fluconazole [relative risk (RR) 0.38, 95% CI 0.14-0.83 and RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.83] or itraconazole tablets (RR 0.22 95% CI 0.06-0.72 and RR 0.20 95% CI 0.05-0.72). Posaconazole was also found to be more effective than no prophylaxis/placebo in reducing all-cause mortality (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-0.98). Posaconazole had the highest probability of being the most effective agent in reducing IFI risk and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: IFI prophylaxis has a positive effect on IFI risk reduction. However, its effect on all-cause mortality is not as pronounced. The analysis has additionally pinpointed posaconazole as potentially the most effective IFI prophylaxis in neutropenic patients. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pechlivanoglou, P., Le, H. H., Daenen, S., Snowden, J. A., & Postma, M. J. (2014, January). Mixed treatment comparison of prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients receiving therapy for haematological malignancies: A systematic review. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt329

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free