Prioritizations of individual surgeons’ patients waiting for elective procedures: A systematic review and future directions

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Context: Infrequent use of tools for surgical patients sequencing results in inappropriate prioritization of patients, waiting days/weeks to have their procedures. Objective: The aim of this project was to assess the proportion of peer-reviewed papers about the prioritization of elective surgical patients that would consider the prioritization of individual surgeons’ patients. Data sources: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched for peer-reviewed papers of studies evaluating developed and/or used tools for prioritization of surgical patients. No restriction was placed on publication date or language. Study design: Systematic review. Data extraction: Data were extracted into a piloted Microsoft Excel 2015 workbook. Results: Among the 146 related papers, only one, published by a study author, used prioritization of individual surgeons’ patients. The single paper illustrated use of a prioritization tool by each of two individual orthopedic surgeons’ patients at a large teaching hospital. Conclusion: There is a paucity of systematic tools for the prioritization of individual surgeons’ patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rahimi, S. A., Dexter, F., & Gu, X. (2018). Prioritizations of individual surgeons’ patients waiting for elective procedures: A systematic review and future directions. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 10, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2017.12.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free