Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health

2Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withstand critical scrutiny. As qualified moral veganism avoids the pitfalls of other moral positions on human diets, public health policies must be altered accordingly, subject to adequate political support for its associated vegan project.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deckers, J. (2017). Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(5), 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free