Abstract
In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withstand critical scrutiny. As qualified moral veganism avoids the pitfalls of other moral positions on human diets, public health policies must be altered accordingly, subject to adequate political support for its associated vegan project.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Deckers, J. (2017). Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(5), 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.