Abstract
Aim: To assess the effect of standard power vs low power transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) in patients with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration ineligible for photodynamic therapy (PDT) by original treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy (TAP) study group recommendations. Methods: Retrospective review of 79 patients with active predominantly occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularization or predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization but Snellen visual acuity <20/ 200. All patients were treated with TTT administered via a Mainster wide field fundus contact lens with a retinal power/diameter coefficient of 248mW/mm in the standard power (n=27) and 181mW/mm in the low power group (n=52). The primary outcome was stabilization (<1 Snellen line change) or improvement (two or more Snellen lines) in visual acuity. Clinical and fluorescein angiographic resolution of overlying exudation was documented. Results: At 24 month follow-up, 17 patients (63%) in the standard power and 36 patients (69%) in the low power group achieved stable or improved vision. Improved vision (mean three lines) was observed in 22% of the standard power and 23% of the low power group. Overlying exudation was reduced clinically with minimal or no leakage on fluorescein angiogram in 85% of standard power and 90% of low power group. Subgroup analysis in the low power group demonstrated a visual benefit in patients with subfoveal lesions, which had any classic component. Conclusions: Low power TTT is as effective as standard power in stabilizing or improving vision and reducing overlying exudation in patients with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization ineligible for PDT. © 2006 Nature Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hogan, A. C., & Kilmartin, D. J. (2006). Low power vs standard power transpupillary thermotherapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration and subfoveal choroidal neovascularization ineligible for photodynamic therapy. Eye. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702028
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.