Association of insurance types and outcomes in acute promyelocytic leukemia

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Understanding the association between insurance status and survival in an evolving US healthcare system remains a challenge but is essential to address healthcare disparities. We utilized National Cancer Database to evaluate the effects of insurance type on one-month mortality and overall survival (OS) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Among patients <65 years, one-month mortality was worse for uninsured patients and patients with Medicare compared to patients with private insurance. OS was similar between patients with private insurance and uninsured patients but worse for patients with Medicare and Medicaid/other government insurance. In multivariate analysis, older age and greater comorbidity burden conferred worse OS. For patients ≥65 years, insurance type did not affect one-month mortality and OS. Older age, greater comorbidity burden, and treatment at non-academic centers conferred worse one-month mortality and OS. Our results highlight healthcare disparities based on insurance types for both younger and older patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dhakal, P., Joshi, U., Lyden, E., Pyakuryal, A., Gundabolu, K., & Bhatt, V. R. (2022). Association of insurance types and outcomes in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia and Lymphoma, 63(11), 2627–2635. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2022.2090554

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free