Ventilatory ratio: A simple bedside measure of ventilation

86Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Measures of oxygenation are traditionally used to monitor the progress of patients on positive pressure ventilation. Although CO2 elimination depends on fewer variables, measures of CO2 elimination are comparatively overlooked except when monitoring patients who are difficult to ventilate. CO2 elimination is dependent upon CO2 production and alveolar ventilation, which together determine Paco2. Alveolar ventilation is the efficient portion of minute ventilation ('E'). In the clinical setting, problems with CO2 elimination are observed as increasing Paco2, increasing minute ventilation, or both. In conventional tests of respiratory function, actual measurements are frequently compared with predicted measurements. However, this approach has rarely been applied to the measurement of ventilatory efficiency.MethodsWe have developed a ratio, called the ventilatory ratio (VR), which compares actual measurements and predicted values of minute ventilation and Paco2. is taken to be 100 (ml kg-1 min-1) based on predicted body weight, and Paco2predicted is taken to be 5 kPa.ResultsInspection shows VR to be a unitless ratio that can be easily calculated at the bedside. VR is governed by carbon dioxide production and ventilatory efficiency in a logically intuitive way. We suggest that VR provides a simple guide to changes in ventilatory efficiency. A value close to 1 is predicted for normal individuals and an increasing value would correspond with worsening ventilation, increased CO2 production, or both.ConclusionsVR is a new tool providing additional information for clinicians managing ventilated patients. © The Author [2009].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinha, P., Fauvel, N. J., Singh, S., & Soni, N. (2009). Ventilatory ratio: A simple bedside measure of ventilation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 102(5), 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep054

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free