Comparative effectiveness of weekly versus every-2-weeks cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer in a US-insured population

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To test the noninferiority of cetuximab administered every 2 weeks (Q2W) versus once weekly (Q1W) in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with regard to overall survival (OS). Patients: Patients receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy for mCRC in a line-agnostic setting. Methods: This cohort study in IBM MarketScan followed patients from initiation of cetuximab for mCRC until the end of the data availability period, proxy-based death or loss of insurance coverage for >30 days. Results: The hazard ratio for OS was 0.94 (0.85-1.03), and the inferiority hypothesis was rejected at p < 0.001. No significant differences were noted in rates of safety events between Q2W and Q1W. Conclusion: Our real-world study confirmed the noninferiority of cetuximab administered Q2W versus Q1W for OS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lamy, F. X., Batech, M., Boutmy, E., Ronga, P., Salim, S., & Pescott, C. P. (2020). Comparative effectiveness of weekly versus every-2-weeks cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer in a US-insured population. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 9(16), 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free