A new approach combining forensic thresholds and a multiple-tubes approach to unravel false microsatellite profiles from cross-contaminated sample material

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Contamination and degradation are known challenges for reliable genotyping, since they can cause, among other problems, false microsatellite profiles. In this study we described a method to decrease the proportion of false microsatellite profiles from fish scale samples of endangered allis shads (Alosa alosa) from a reintroduction program, where cross-contamination with DNA from other individuals and potentially degradation of samples occurred. To maximize the portion of reliably measurable results, we modified and combined two known approaches—thresholds used in forensic DNA analyses and a multiple-tubes approach. This combined approach increased reliable microsatellite profiles compared with single approaches. The forensic thresholds and the multiple-tubes approach increased the measurable results from 55 to 67% and 75%, respectively, whereas the combined approach accomplished an increase to 90%. This illustrates the potential of the combined approach for other studies with comparable problems or sample material.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mäck, K., Scharbert, A., Schulz, R., & Sahm, R. (2021). A new approach combining forensic thresholds and a multiple-tubes approach to unravel false microsatellite profiles from cross-contaminated sample material. Conservation Genetics Resources, 13(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-020-01175-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free