Knee dGEMRIC at 7 T: Comparison against 1.5 T and evaluation of T 1 -mapping methods

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: dGEMRIC (delayed Gadolinium Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Image of Cartilage) is a well-established technique for cartilage quality assessment in osteoarthritis at clinical field strengths. The method is robust, but requires injection of contrast agent and a cumbersome examination procedure. New non-contrast-agent-based techniques for cartilage quality assessment are currently being developed at 7 T. However, dGEMRIC remains an important reference technique during this development. The aim of this work was to compare T 1 mapping for dGEMRIC at 7 T and 1.5 T, and to evaluate three T 1 -mapping methods at 7 T. Methods: The knee of 10 healthy volunteers and 9 patients with early signs of cartilage degradation were examined at 1.5 T and 7 T after a single (one) contrast agent injection (Gd-(DTPA) 2- ). Inversion recovery (IR) sequences were acquired at both field strengths, and at 7 T variable flip angle (VFA) and Look-Locker (LL) sequences were additionally acquired. T 1 maps were calculated and average T 1 values were estimated within superficial and deep regions-of-interest (ROIs) in the lateral and medial condyles, respectively. Results: T 1 values were 1.8 (1.4-2.3) times longer at 7 T. A strong correlation was detected between 1.5 T and 7 T T 1 values (r = 0.80). For IR, an additional inversion time was required to avoid underestimation (bias±limits of agreement - 127 ± 234 ms) due to the longer T 1 values at 7 T. Out of the two 3D sequences tested, LL resulted in more accurate and precise T 1 estimation compared to VFA (average bias±limits of agreement LL: 12 ± 202 ms compared to VFA: 25 ± 622 ms). For both, B 1 correction improved agreement to IR. Conclusion: With an adapted sampling scheme, dGEMRIC T 1 mapping is feasible at 7 T and correlates well to 1.5 T. If 3D is to be used for T 1 mapping of the knee at 7 T, LL is preferred and VFA is not recommended. For VFA and LL, B 1 correction is necessary for accurate T 1 estimation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peterson, P., Tiderius, C. J., Olsson, E., Lundin, B., Olsson, L. E., & Svensson, J. (2018). Knee dGEMRIC at 7 T: Comparison against 1.5 T and evaluation of T 1 -mapping methods. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2071-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free