Influence of testing parameters on the load-bearing capacity of prosthetic materials used for fixed dental prosthesis: A systematic review

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to assess static fracture strength tests applied for fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and analyze the impact of periodontal ligament (PDL) simulation on the fracture strength. Material and Methods: Original scientific papers published in MEDLINE (PubMed) database between 01/01/1981 and 10/06/2018 were included in this systematic review. The following MeSH terms, search terms, and their combinations were used:“Dentistry”, “Fracture Strength”, “Fracture Resistance”, “Fixed Dental Prosthesis”, “Fixed Partial Denture”, “Mechanical Loading”. Two reviewers performed screening and analyzed the data. Only the in vitro studies that reported on load-bearing capacity of only FDP materials where mean or median values reported in Newnton (N) were included. Results: The selection process resulted in the 57 studies. In total, 36 articles were identified related to all-ceramics, 10 were fiber reinforced composite resin (FRC), 8 of composite resin (C) and 5 of metal-ceramic. As for clinical indications, 3 and 4-unit FDPs were more commonly studied (n=32; with PDL=21, without PDL=11), followed by single crowns (n=13; with PDL=3, without PDL=10), and inlay-retained and cantilever FDPs (n=12; with PDL=8, without PDL=4). Conclusion: An inclination for decreased static fracture strength could be observed with the simulation of PDL but due to insufficient data this could not be generalized for all materials used for FDPs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Özcan, M., Höhn, J., Araújo, G. M. de, Moura, D. M. D., & Souza, R. O. A. (2018). Influence of testing parameters on the load-bearing capacity of prosthetic materials used for fixed dental prosthesis: A systematic review. Brazilian Dental Science, 21(4), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2018.v21i4.1652

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free