How Shall We Measure Our Progress? On Paradigms, Metaphors, and Meetings in Audience Research

3Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article (which began life as a presentation to the closing CEDAR Conference in Lisbon, 2017) interrogates the state of the “field” of audience research, by looking back to Thomas Kuhn’s work on paradigms in science, and the institutional conditions necessary for their operation. It then looks forward to recent work in the sociology of expectations, to consider the role of future predictions. The article concludes that audience research is perhaps not a field or a discipline, although the aspiration to be so is not altogether a bad thing. The article suggests that the best destiny for the field is to be a rogue element within the broader media, communication, and cultural studies domain, demanding—and providing—empirical evidence in the face of normatively charged claims.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barker, M. (2019). How Shall We Measure Our Progress? On Paradigms, Metaphors, and Meetings in Audience Research. Television and New Media, 20(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418813441

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free