Imagem corporal de gestantes: associação com variáveis sociodemográficas, antropométricas e obstétricas

  • Meireles J
  • Neves C
  • Carvalho P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare body attitudes of pregnant women in various body mass index categories, during different gestational periods and under gestational risk conditions, as well as to analyze the association of the study variables with the body attitudes of pregnant women. METHODS: We included 386 pregnant women in all gestational periods, aged 18 to 46 years (mean 29.32±6.04 years), who attended prenatal care in the public and private sectors of a city in Southeastern Brazil, excluding women with incomplete data. The instruments for assessment were “Body Attitudes Questionnaire”, “Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil”, and a sociodemographic questionnaire. In addition, anthropometric and obstetric data were collected. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The body attitudes of pregnant women were similar in all pregnancy trimesters (F=0.39; p=0.9). Negative body attitudes increased gradually among low weight (108.2±12.5), appropriate weight (116.2±16.0), overweight (125.1±14.3), and obese (132.9±16.4) groups, and among pregnancy women with normal (120.0±17.1) and high-risk pregnancies (124.9±16.7). The sociodemographic, economic, and obstetric variables did not influence the variance of body attitudes. The body mass index explained 11.3% of the variance of body attitudes in pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional status and risk conditions showed an association with negative body image and should therefore be evaluated in pregnant women for a better maternal and child health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C. M., Carvalho, P. H. B. de, & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2015). Imagem corporal de gestantes: associação com variáveis sociodemográficas, antropométricas e obstétricas. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 37(7), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-720320150005388

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free