Robotics in Precision Agriculture: Task-, Platform-, and Evaluation-Oriented Review

Abstract

Robotics is increasingly positioned as an enabling technology for precision agriculture, where management actions must be spatially and temporally targeted under constraints on labour, input use, safety, and environmental impact. This review synthesises studies on agricultural field robotics and organises the literature along four complementary axes: task (monitoring, weeding, spraying, and harvesting), platform (UGV, UAV, gantry/fixed-structure, greenhouse robot, and hybrid systems), autonomy-stack module (perception, localisation, planning, control, actuation, safety, and human–robot interaction), and evaluation setting (lab, greenhouse, open-field single season, and open-field multi-season/multi-site). Across these dimensions, this review analyses how platform constraints shape sensing geometry, actuation capability, localisation reliability, energy/endurance, supervision burden, and safety requirements. It further examines enabling technologies that recur across tasks, including vision and multimodal perception under occlusion and illumination variability, localisation and mapping under weak or denied GNSS, uncertainty-aware planning in deformable and partially observed environments, and compliant end-effectors for contact-rich operations. Beyond cataloguing systems, this paper emphasises evaluation practice by synthesising core task-relevant metrics, comparing laboratory and field validation settings, and proposing a reporting checklist and benchmark ladder to improve reproducibility and cross-study comparability. This review identifies recurring bottlenecks in domain shift, long-term autonomy, calibration robustness, crop-safe actuation, and safety assurance near humans, and it concludes with a staged research roadmap linking near-term evaluation reform to longer-term credible multi-site autonomy. Overall, this paper provides a structured framework for interpreting agricultural robotic systems not only by application but also by deployment context, system maturity, and evaluation credibility.