A study of unrestricted abstract argumentation frameworks

22Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research in abstract argumentation typically pertains to finite argumentation frameworks (AFs). Actual or potential infinite AFs frequently occur if they are used for the purpose of nonmonotonic entailment, so-called instantiation-based argumentation, or if they are involved as modeling tool for dialogues, n-person-games or action sequences. Apart from these practical cases a profound analysis yields a better understanding of how the nonmonotonic theory of abstract argumentation works in general. In this paper we study a bunch of abstract properties like SCC-recursiveness, expressiveness or intertranslatability for unrestricted AFs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumann, R., & Spanring, C. (2017). A study of unrestricted abstract argumentation frameworks. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 0, pp. 807–813). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free