User-centred design vs. “Good” data base design principles: A case study, creating knowledge repositories for indigenous australians

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2006-07, the author was involved in redesigning a database storing traditional knowledge of Australian Aboriginal clans. The project raised issues relating to the design of repositories for indigenous knowledge, including theoretical approaches taken to ontology (knowledge structures, classification systems) and metadata creation. This paper describes the design process undertaken, in which user-centred design principles accommodated an emergent contrast between traditional knowledge customs and “good” database design principles. Theoretical approaches taken to ontology are presented, and the format of the restructured database is discussed in general terms. Assembling evidence from usability testing and qualitative research, the paper concludes that a flexible ontological system was needed to provide the customisability required by indigenous users – a system whose iterations and applications may usefully represent widely differing aboriginal cultures. © 2009 Australian Academic and Research Libraries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Godbold, N. (2009). User-centred design vs. “Good” data base design principles: A case study, creating knowledge repositories for indigenous australians. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 40(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2009.10721390

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free